• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Film
  • DVD
  • Editorial
  • About ScreenFish

ScreenFish

where faith and film are intertwined

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • News
  • OtherFish
  • Podcast
  • Give

Sebastian Stan

Pam & Tommy: What are You Looking At?

February 2, 2022 by Steve Norton Leave a Comment

‘What are you lookin’ at?’

Taken from Hulu’s limited series, Pam & Tommy, this may seem like a simple, throwaway line but it actually asks a much deeper question about the way we view our celebrities and each other. Smartly written and executed, this is a show about power and control… and it all starts with the way we look at one another.

Set in the days just prior to the internet explosion, Pam & Tommy is based on the events surrounding the release of Pamela Anderson (Lily James) and Tommy Lee (Sebastian Stan)’s infamous sex tape. After a disgruntled contractor (Seth Rogan) steals the tape from their home, the intimate personal moments of one of Hollywood’s power couples became a global phenomenon that had everyone talking. 

Created by Robert Siegel, Pam & Tommy begins as an energetic heist series but becomes a powerful and poignant commentary on the destructive power of toxic masculinity. While there are moments where the narrative threatens to unravel into soapy madness, the performances by James and Stan are so convincing that they immediately pull the viewer back into the story. Together, their chemistry is palpable. The push and pull between them has an electricity that works in almost every moment they are together onscreen. 

As the violently erratic Tommy Lee, Stan is utterly unrecognizable and leans fully into the performance. However, its James who is absolutely mesmerizing. With each passing episode, James shows an increasing strength that is both powerful and compelling. Although she portrays Anderson with patience and grace, James fuels her with a quiet rage that simmers underneath. There is a fire and fury in her performance that demands attention. (Incidentally, while Tommy Lee has reportedly given the series his blessing, Anderson has declined to officially support it.)

Whether one realizes it or not, the release of Pam and Tommy’s sex tape was a game-changing moment in the way that our culture consumes both sexuality and celebrity. However, rather than use the series to satirize its subjects, Siegel and his team see this as an opportunity to deconstruct the damage caused by the male gaze. 

Admittedly, at the beginning of the series, the show feels imbalanced. For a show called Pam & Tommy, there’s a surprisingly heavy emphasis on Tommy over Pam in the first few episodes. As a result, it feels like the wrong story is about to be told.

But that’s part of the point.

What makes Pam & Tommy so interesting is that is more invested in putting our cultural obsession with sexuality on trial and, most specifically, the male gaze. As the series begins, there’s a heavy emphasis on the male perspective. Rand can’t handle working as Tommy’s contractor and wants to screw over the guy who was doing the same to him. Tommy’s career is struggling as the music scene transitions to a grunge market. Uncle Miltie makes fast money exploiting sexuality and sees an opportunity to do so at Tommy’s expense. From the outset, this very clearly a man’s world and they are taking the lead within it.

Because that’s what men do, right? Take control.

However, as Pam & Tommyprogresses, there’s a dramatic shift in the series’ voice. The presence of strong women directors like Lake Bell, Gwenyth Horder-Payton and Hannah Fidell behind the camera provide the necessary perspective to shape the show’s view of sexuality in a healthier manner. What’s more, James’ Anderson begins to move increasingly into the forefront and the conversation surrounding the toxicity of the male gaze becomes more prominent. Whether it’s Anderson’s producers on Baywatch or the way that their tape is consumed so rapidly, the harm caused by the oppressive masculine view is increasingly obvious. To them, Pam is little more than the sum of her features and it silences her voice. 

As such, the devastation by the release of the infamous tape is far deeper than making a few dollars. Made as a celebration of their love and for their eyes only, their tape became a weapon that was used against them. With each viewing, the tape reinforces the culture’s dangerous celebration of Lee as sexually powerful and criticism of Anderson as sexual property. Seeing their personal and private moments changes the way that the public values them.

At the same time, it’s worth noting that Pam & Tommy more than earns its R-rating, especially in the absolutely wild second episode. (After all, sexuality is core to the conversation here.) However, that more graphic content gradually disappears as the series takes its use of sexuality more seriously. In a show about exploitation, Pam & Tommy also wants to ensure that it does not become part of the problem.

In fact, what Pam & Tommy does so well is remind the viewer that this was a video that none of us were ever supposed to see. For example, as each man stares deeply at their screen to watch Pam & Tommy’s most intimate moments, the series leaves the monitors off to the viewer. We hear the tape—but we are not allowed to see it for ourselves. In a brilliant choice by the showrunners, the series keeps the viewer at a safe distance from the visuals. (In fact, the only times where the tape can be viewed at all are in moments when the couple watch it themselves.) The series never condemns the couple for making the tape but refuses to allow us to participate in watching it.

In many ways, it’s heart-breaking that the real Anderson has declined to sign off—or even comment—on the series itself. Perhaps the details of the events are incorrect. Perhaps they simply wanted to put this chapter of their lives behind them. Whatever the reason, her lack of involvement is somewhat of a shame. (And arguably bites back at the nature of consent as well.) Despite its pop-fueled energy, this depiction of Pam & Tommy never feels as salacious as it could have been told. 

If anything, it feels more like a public apology.

While the series never judges the industry itself, it makes a point of identifying the toxicity that is created when consent is ignored. Coming at a time when celebrity cellphone hacks are common and privacy is at an all-time low, Pam & Tommy suggests that the real poison in our culture comes when we choose the body over the soul. It acknowledges that Pam and Tommy are real people and, if anything, we are in the wrong for viewing them as any less. 

For all of these reasons, Pam & Tommy becomes much more than simply a dramatic representation of a sexual scandal. Showrunner Siegel and his team have instead used the trauma of one couple to explore problems that extend far beyond one tape or moment in history. Through Pam & Tommy, they remind us that what we’re looking at changes the way we see the world.

The first three episodes of Pam & Tommy stream on Hulu and Star+ on Wednesday, February 2nd, 2022 with new episodes following weekly.

Filed Under: Featured, Hulu, Reviews Tagged With: Baywatch, Disney, Fred Hechinger, Gwenyth Horder-Payton, Hannah Fidell, Lake Bell, lily james, Nick Offerman, Pam & Tommy, Robert Siegel, Sebastian Stan, Seth Rogan, Taylor Schilling

7.19 Diverse Heroes in THE FALCON AND THE WINTER SOLDIER

May 30, 2021 by Steve Norton Leave a Comment

With the release of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, Marvel finally begins to grapple with one of the most pertinent questions after Avengers: Endgame: Who will take on the shield of Captain America? However, at the same time, the latest series on Disney+ also tries to delve into the much larger issues of American history and racial inequity. This week, Seun Olowo-Ake and Heather Johnson return to tackle questions regarding murky morality, the importance of new perspectives and the battle for the American soul.

You can stream the episode on podomatic, Alexa (via Stitcher), Spotify or Amazon Podcasts! Or, you can download the ep on Apple Podcasts!

Want to continue to conversation at home?  Click the link below to download ‘Fishing for More’ — some small group questions for you to bring to those in your area.

7.19 The Falcon and the Winter SoldierDownload

Filed Under: Disney+, Featured, Podcast Tagged With: Anthony Mackie, Daniel Bruhl, MCU, racial inequality, Sebastian Stan, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, Zemo

The Falcon and the Winter Soldier: Battle Scars and Bank Loans

March 19, 2021 by Steve Norton Leave a Comment

Next one up.

With seven series and five films (!) on tap for 2021, it’s fair to say that Marvel wants to keep their schedule moving along. As a result, even though we’re only two weeks out from the finale of WandaVision (don’t you kind of miss Agatha already?), the House that Stan Lee Built has already moved on to their latest Disney+ entry with The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, a series which explores what it means to be a hero when you’re stuck living in the shadow of another legend.

The Falcon and the Winter Soldier picks up shortly after the events of Avengers: Endgame. (With no direct ties to WandaVision, there’s no obvious indication from the series where they fall in the timeline with one another.) Living from military contract to contract, Sam ‘The Falcon’ Wilson (Antony Mackie) has passed on the opportunity to take on the mantle of Captain America, opting instead to go home and help his sister deal with their family’s fishing business. Meanwhile, Bucky “The Winter Soldier” Barnes (Sebastian Stan) continues to live a life of solitude as he attempts to make amends for his past crimes. However, as a new evil lurks in the shadows, Sam and Bucky must work together to expose their plan and save the world once again.

With the global success of WandaVision and today’s release of the first episode of Falcon, Marvel (and Disney) have seamlessly moved from an (almost) exclusively MCU to the M-TV-U. But, so far at least, the most unexpected element has been the quality of the series thus far.

In some ways, it should not a shock that the Marvel product has been translating so well onto the small screen. While the MCU is known for its big budget special effects and larger than life battle sequence, the material has never forgotten its roots in comic books and long-form storytelling. (Besides, what is the Marvel Cinematic Universe if not the modern equivalent of the Saturday morning serials with a larger budget?) 

Even so, it does come as a bit startling how patient Marvel has been with their storytelling with this new venture into television. For example, in WandaVision, it wasn’t until the 3rd or 4th episode before the Marvel connections really began to take shape. With Falcon, Marvel again shows their confidence in their storytelling (and their fan base) by adopting this patient approach. Though this series will ultimately be only six episodes long, the introduction to the series primarily focuses on the challenges in the lives of our two protagonists. (Seriously, when did you ever think you’d see an Avenger struggle to get a bank loan? Doesn’t S.H.I.E.L.D. take care of their own?) While the series opens with a solid action scene, the rest of the episode focuses almost exclusively on character development, grappling with issues of PTSD and systemic racism.

It instantly impressed me.

Marvel has always been at its most interesting when they take risks. Whereas WandaVision leaned in exclusively into television history, Falcon (so far) seems committed to telling a story that focuses on what happens when the war [seems to be] over. With Sam working from contract to contract and Bucky grappling with the sins of his past, the two men are attempting to reintegrate their lives with everyone else. Though known as heroes for their time with the Avengers, they are now struggling to get by. Whether it’s trying to pay the bills or simply living with extreme anxiety, both Sam and Bucky are coming to grips with life after the shield. 

Now, of course, we know that the story is not going to end there. Teases of a new evil organization point to a more traditional MCU series of large-scale military battles on the horizon. But, for now at least, their greatest battle is understanding the legacy they leave behind. In this way, Sam’s story feels the most relevant. After having passed on the mantle of Captain America, he’s wrestling with his own worthiness as a hero and the missed opportunity to follow in the footsteps of an American icon. Sam understands that the world ‘needs a new hero [that’s] suited for the times we’re in.’ But he doesn’t believe that he can be that person…yet, anyways. (Certainly, the prospect of an African American lead taking on the role of Captain America would be an important opportunity that Disney needs to take—but that remains to be seen at this time.) For Sam (and Bucky as well), the mantle of ‘hero’ simply feels overwhelming. They know who they are and what they’ve done and, because of it, the standard of heroism simply feels too high for them to apply. 

While I’m certain that, eventually, the men will reconcile their past with their role as heroes, it is always interesting when Marvel challenges their characters emotionally. In Falcon and the Winter Soldier, there is a recognition that the mantle of responsibility must be taken seriously. At the same time though, the series also hints at the fact that all leaders are imperfect at some level, meaning true worthiness stems from some other aspect of their character.

But we’ll have to wait for the show to unravel to tell us what that is.

The first episode of Falcon and the Winter Soldier is available to stream on Disney+ on Friday, March 18th, 2021, with new episodes every Friday.

Filed Under: Disney+, Featured, Reviews, SmallFish, VOD Tagged With: Anthony Mackie, Avengers, Disney, Disney+, Marvel, MCU, PTSD, Sebastian Stan, systemic racism, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

Destroyer: Into the Darkness

January 11, 2019 by Steve Norton Leave a Comment

Destroyer tells the story of Detective Erin Bell (Nicole Kidman), an LAPD officer who, in her youth, went undercover to infiltrate a gang in the desolation of the California desert. Traumatized by the experience, Bell presently continues to work as a detective for the Los Angeles Police Department despite her overwhelming guilt. However, when the leader of that gang suddenly resurfaces, Erin embarks on a mission to find his former associates, bring him to justice while coming face to face with her past life.

Directed by Karen Karusama, Destroyer is a slow burn of a thriller, equally compelling and vexing. By boldly breaking down her narrative structure, Karusama creates an plays with the past in a way that informs the present. While this can prove frustrating at first, the film gradually unravels in a way that validates her approach. As Detective Bell, Kidman is virtually unrecognizable, fully immersing herself into the seedy underbelly of a bleak and hopeless environment. Known for her dramatic flair, it is this role that reveals her true range as an actress as she plays Bell with a surprising but desolate fury. In what could be a potentially career-defining role, this is Kidman at her very best and wildest.

Stepping into the darkness of the bleak Los Angeles heat, Destroyer highlights a world where evil marks everything in its path. Criminals can’t escape their past, even if they want to. The integrity of the police is flexible. In a world overrun by shadows, no one is safe from the stain of sin. Struggling to get through each day, Bell becomes the very picture of brokenness as she allows the demons of her past to unleash her inner demons. Unlike other characters who fight to free to themselves from their past, Bell has allowed herself to be completely swallowed by it. While her intentions start out well, she is slowly contaminated by her environment. As she descends into the underworld, the lines between good and evil become blurred and Bell’s judgment is compromised irreparably. Even in the present, Bell bears the scars of her past in ways that prevent her from escaping it. Despite the fact that she’s gotten out, she has never truly broken free.

Admittedly, hope in this world is hard to find. Interestingly, there is a glimmer of possibility through the eyes of Bell’s daughter, Shelby (Jade Pettyjohn). Even if she too is feeling the pull towards the darkness, Bell’s most redeeming quality is that she hopes her daughter “will be [a] better [person] than she is”. Through the character of Shelby, Karusama allows the viewer to believe that—maybe—there is a chance to break the cycle of pain and suffering in the future. Despite the bleak atmosphere, Shelby represents the opportunity to move forward and escape, provided she can learn from her mother’s mistakes

Playing out as an intense hybrid of Chinatown and Breaking Bad, Destroyer unleashes a world where everyone is tainted by culture’s pervasive evil. Buoyed by powerful performances and confident direction, the film gives itself the freedom to unfurl its narrative with boiling intensity.

Destroyer is in theatres now.

Filed Under: Film, Film Festivals, Reviews, TIFF Tagged With: Crime, crime story, Destroyer, Nicole Kidman, Sebastian Stan

I, Tonya – Whose Truth?

December 7, 2017 by Darrel Manson Leave a Comment

“I was loved for a minute, then I was hated.”

Figure skating is all about elegance and grace. So when in 1994 the sport took on a violent aspect with an attack on a top skater before the Olympics, it became one of the early examples of TV tabloid journalism. I, Tonya tells the story of Tonya Harding who was at the center of the controversy because her ex-husband Jeff Gillooly masterminded the attack on a rival skater. In the days and weeks that followed the story became more sensationalized by the day. Screenwriter/producer Steve Rogers has crafted a dark comedy from the strange, almost absurdist, true events. It is based in part on interviews Rogers did with Harding and Gillooly, now in their 40s. The widely different stories each told became the structure for the film.

The story follows the life of Harding (Margot Robbie) from childhood to the present day. Even before “The Incident”, she never really fit well into the skating world, in spite of her talent and skill. She came from an abusive household. Her mother LaVona Golden (Allison Janney) was both physically and emotionally violent. Her escape was to marry Gillooly (Sebastian Stan) at an early age. This too turned into a violent, abusive relationship. It should be pointed out that Harding was not just a victim, but could be violent herself. All of this contributed to a low self-image. At times, she felt like she deserved the abuse. And much of her competitiveness was an attempt to be loved.

Much of the humor of the film comes from the personalities. LaVona Golden is an especially over the top character (and played to the hilt by Janney). It’s hard to image a mother so cruel and crude, yet we can’t get enough of her on screen. Likewise, the relationship between Harding and Gillooly, often with sudden explosive violence, may seem too dark for humor, yet we can’t help but follow along because the story is told in such an appealing style.

The film takes its time getting to The Incident, but when it does make it into the story, it is the beginning of one of the all time great comedies of errors. When we speak of the media circus that developed because of it, circus is the appropriate word because the clowns take center stage. Again here, the story is told from different perspectives, so there is more than one version of what happened.

Since there are multiple versions of the same story, this becomes a study on how we can know the truth. The memories of what happened are so different that it is impossible to piece them together to form a clear picture of who was or was not involved. The tabloid journalism that latched on to this story only made the search for truth murkier. The 24-hour news cycle and its need to keep a story alive may actually make the truth harder to find. In a world where “fake news” is frequently charged and even outlandish ideas are given coverage in the name of “balance”, this story serves as a challenge for us to seek truth amid all the hoopla and distraction.

When I saw this film at AFI Fest, it played to a packed house. It wasn’t one of the films I was especially looking forward to but I found it enjoyable in the absurd humor and the idiocy of the characters. Though, when a few weeks later I saw a trailer in the theater, I thought to myself, “I wouldn’t want to see that.” So, perhaps if you’re put off by the trailer, you may want to consider that there is more here than the trailer suggests.

Photos courtesy of Neon.

Filed Under: Film, Reviews Tagged With: AFIFest, allison janney, based on a true story, Craig Gillespie, ice skating, Margot Robbie, Olympics, Sebastian Stan, Steve Rogers, Tonya Harding, true crime

Captain America: Civil War — Conflict Breeds Catastrophe

May 5, 2016 by J. Alan Sharrer Leave a Comment

#TeamCap FightsLet’s get the basic questions out of the way before we begin the review.

Is Captain America: Civil War any good?  You bet it is!
Is it a perfect film? 
Nope.
Is there lots of fighting? Oh yes. And then some.
How’s Spider Man?
Well . . . He needs some practice.
Does the film leave the door open for future movies?
I think you know the answer to that one.
So who wins the Civil War?
Uh . . . I’m not going to tell you that. Why are you asking me?

Feel better?  No? Okay, then let’s review the film (with minor spoilers, if that).

If you’ve been under a rock for the last few years, Marvel Studios has been building a comic book-based empire on the strength of The Avengers, Iron Man, and Captain America. Captain America: Civil War adds to and builds on the previous movies, offering moviegoers a rollicking, fast-paced thrill ride that may take more than one viewing to adequately enjoy.

The story begins with the Avengers attempting to ward off a potential crisis in Nigeria.  However, something goes awry and innocent lives are lost.  This seems to be a theme of past films (New York and Sokovia, for example), so the governments of the world have decided it’s time for those with superpowers to have limits. Thus, the Sokovia Accords are drafted, giving the Avengers a choice: submit to governmental control or retire.

Avengers at Headquarters

If you’re a fan of the comics, you know there will be disagreements as to what should be done. Captain America/Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) feels that limits will only breed more limits and make their jobs more difficult. Iron Man/Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr) says that without limitations, they’re “no better than the bad guys.” Both are stubborn and won’t budge on their positions, gathering various Avengers to their separate points of view. Your favorite characters are all here: Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), Black Widow (Scarlett Johnasson), Vision (Paul Bettany), Falcon (Anthony Mackie), Ant-Man (Paul Ruud), Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen), and War Machine (Don Cheadle).  The addition of Black Panther/T’Challa (Chad Boseman) makes the situation more difficult (but man, is he an incredible character to watch on screen).

Meanwhile, the Winter Soldier/Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan) is dealing with a lot of things that spin the other part of the plot in motion. Captain America has a tie to him and this comes into play as the film advances to an inevitable clash held at the airport in Berlin. There’s lots of fighting, lots of gadgetry, and a few surprises along the way. But as Vision notes, “Conflict breeds catastrophe.” The question is whether the Avengers, Captain America, and Iron Man will figure this out before it’s too late.

Captain America Meets Spider-ManOh yeah, and there’s Spider-Man/Peter Parker (Tom Holland).  He has a role in the fight in Berlin, but seems more in awe of the others than anything.  He’s also learning about his superpowers—with mixed results. One part of the film that irked me involved Aunt May (Marisa Tomei)—don’t go in expecting her to be old like in the comics. In fact, guys might even be smitten by her.

In the end, the themes of vengeance, love, family, and loyalty come into play, though I’ll leave it to you to figure out how and in what manner it happens. Suffice it to say that the words of Ecclesiastes 4:9-10 mean something in Civil War.

The film is nearly 2 ½ hours long, but it doesn’t feel that way due to the hyperkinetic pacing by directors Anthony and Joe Russo. Fight sequences are everywhere, surprises abound, and details are peppered throughout that help drive the plot forward. I do wish the villain (played by Martin Freeman) had been fleshed out a little bit more, but that’s nitpicking when events are unfolding so rapidly. The music isn’t overpowering but adds little to the whole scheme of affairs.  You’re there for the action, so that’s what you’re going to get.

And you’re going to like it.

(PS – Stay for the credits, as there are not one but two additional scenes that will leave you talking on the way out of the theater.)

Filed Under: Film, Reviews Tagged With: Ant-Man, Anthony Mackie, Anthony Russo, Aunt May, Avengers, Berlin, Black Widow, Bucky Barnes, Captain America, Captain America: Civil War, Chris Evans, Don Cheadle, Elizabeth Olsen, Falcon, Family, Government, Hawkeye, Iron Man, Jeremy Renner, Joe Russo, Love, Loyalty, Marisa Tomei, Martin Freeman, New York, Nigeria, Paul Betteny, Paul Ruud, Robert Downey Jr, Scarlet Witch, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Sokovia, spider-man, tom holland, vengeance, Vision, War Machine, Winter Soldier

The Martian: Survive or Die (Oscar Spotlight: Best Picture)

February 9, 2016 by J. Alan Sharrer Leave a Comment

The MartianHumans have, ingrained in their DNA, a desire and longing for community. It started when God realized that it wasn’t good for Adam to be alone—his response was to create Eve as a companion and helper (see Genesis 2:18). But what happens if, by some unfortunate series of events, you’re the only one left on the planet—or worse, another planet? You really have two options—survive or die. This is part of the reason why the The Martian is up for a Best Picture nomination at this year’s Academy Awards. Based on the book by Andy Weir, it chronicles the harrowing adventures of astronaut Mark Watney on the planet Mars.  The film is actually up for seven different Oscars (including Matt Damon for Best Actor), but I’m going to focus on the Best Picture award.

First, a reminder of the plot. The Martian begins with an emergency escape from the planet when a massive storm appears at base camp. Five of the six astronauts make it onboard the rescue rover, with Watney left behind for dead after he’s speared by a communications antenna. Miraculously, he survives, but is in a world of hurt as the next mission to the Red Planet isn’t scheduled to arrive for another four years. With a limited supply of food and water, he has to decide what to do.  Watney’s decision: “I’m not going to die here.” Thus, he sets about trying to make life happen, all while recording his escapades via video journals.  His saving grace is that he’s a botanist and knows how to grow things. But that won’t last forever, and when the habitat depressurizes, destroying his crop, the fight for survival becomes more acute.

Watney and his plantsMeanwhile, NASA finally discovers he’s alive (after announcing his death) and sets out creating a plan to get him back, helped by scientists at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Rushing things doesn’t work, as they find out the hard way on their next launch.  Director Teddy Sanders (Jeff Bridges) has to try something, and when out of options, gets help in the form of China’s space program. When an astrodynamics student named Rich Purnell (Donald Glover) comes up with a faster way to get Watney—but one that will keep the rescued astronauts in space for another year—the idea is dismissed.  But when it’s covertly shared with the crew, they agree to try it—risking their own lives in the process.  The world holds its collective breath as an unheard of rescue is attempted.

So what makes The Martian worthy of Best Picture status? First off, the landscape and set design is exquisite and conveys a planet of extreme isolation, complete with unpredictable storms and unforgiving terrain. The attention to detail even extends to the scientific terminology used, conveying the possibility that an event like this could feasibly occur.  Dialogue is realistic and doesn’t seem to be forced (outside of a) the constant references to Commander Lewis [Jessica Chastain] and her love of disco and b) the relationship between Johanssen [Kate Mara] and Beck [Sebastian Stan]). Speaking of music, the soundtrack is refreshingly sparse.

Tension is controlled by director Ridley Scott in ways that make the viewer experience a range of emotions—from shock to euphoria. Finally, the acting is on point, with believable and convincing characters (none moreso than Damon’s intriguing portrayal of Watney). As a result, the viewer is transported from the theater into a very delicate situation where one wrong move could mean a loss of lives.

The crew of the HermesOutside of the earlier reference to community, there are also many references to faith found in the film (not that they have any bearing on making a film Best Picture-worthy, but are still nice). The concept of mission is found as Watney emails Commander Lewis a note with the charge to tell his parents, “I’m dying for something big and beautiful and greater than me.” That sure sounds like something the apostle Paul would’ve penned—and probably the other apostles to boot. The ending also allows for the concept of complete trust to have someone save you when you have no ability to do it yourself (see Romans 5:8).

In the end, The Martian is a worthy film to be considered for this year’s Best Picture nomination. Will it win?  I’m not certain, as there are a number of films that take that title as well. But if it succeeds, I wouldn’t be surprised at all. With a compelling story, great acting, and fantastic visuals, you should give this one a viewing if you haven’t already. You’ll understand what it means to truly survive—as well as a few other things along the way.

Filed Under: DVD, Featured, Film, Oscar Spotlight, Reviews Tagged With: Academy Awards, Best Picture, Donald Glover, Hermes, Isolation, Jeff Bridges, Jessica Chastain, Kate Mara, Mars, Matt Damon, NASA, Oscar, Sebastian Stan, Space, Survival, The Martian

Primary Sidebar

THE SF NEWS

Get a special look, just for you.

sf podcast

Hot Off the Press

  • Thor: Love and Thunder – [Faith, Hope] and Love and Thunder
  • Culture Shock: Blowing Up Independence Day
  • Jerry and Marge Go Large: Breaking Bank
  • Mr. Malcolm’s List: Having Great Expectations
  • Attack on Finland: Boom, Boom, Pow
Find tickets and showtimes on Fandango.

where faith and film are intertwined

film and television carry stories which remind us of the stories God has woven since the beginning of time. come with us on a journey to see where faith and film are intertwined.

Footer

ScreenFish Articles

Thor: Love and Thunder – [Faith, Hope] and Love and Thunder

Culture Shock: Blowing Up Independence Day

  • About ScreenFish
  • Privacy Policy

© 2022 · ScreenFish.net · Built by Aaron Lee

Posting....
 

Loading Comments...