• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Film
  • DVD
  • Editorial
  • About ScreenFish

ScreenFish

where faith and film are intertwined

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • News
  • OtherFish
  • Podcast
  • Give

charlottesville

BlacKkKlansman – Spike Lee Brings It

Until fairly recently, Spike Lee was the only go-to African-American filmmaker. Over the last few decades he has given us important looks at racism and the African-American experience, in both narrative and documentary forms. His newest film, BlacKkKlansman, continues to do so with entertainment, but also speaking loudly about the struggles our society continues to deal with. Even though the film in set in the 1970s, it sounds and looks like today.

Based on a true story (or as a title card at the beginning tells us, ?Dis joint is based on some fo? real, fo? real sh*t?), the film follows Ron Stallworth (John David Washington), the first African-American detective in the Colorado Springs Police Department. In his first undercover assignment he infiltrates a crowd at a speech given by Kwame Ture (aka Stokely Carmichael), where he meets Patrice Dumas (Laura Harrier), the president of the local Black Students Union. They are attracted to each other and begin a relationship.

While working in the intelligence department, Ron notes an ad in a paper seeking to recruit for the Ku Klux Klan. He calls the number and speaks to a local organizer, telling him how much he hates Black people. (Note: Various derogatory terms are used throughout the film to speak of African-Americans and Jews. You know what they are. I don?t have to use them.) When the organizer wants to meet with Ron, he must recruit one of his fellow detectives, Flip Zimmerman (Adam Driver), to take on that aspect of the investigation. Between them, Ron and Flip are soon deeply involved with the local ?Organization? and Ron is frequently talking by phone with David Duke (Topher Grace), the Grand Dragon and Executive Director of the KKK. As the film goes on, they discover a possible violent plot and must try to prevent it.

The film?s set up is by its very nature humorous, but this is not exactly a comedy. The satirical aspects may give us some chuckles, but the reality of the situation (including the current reality surrounding White Supremacy) keeps this firmly grounded in the realm of drama and social commentary.

Parallels play an interesting role in the story telling; especially the parallels between the Black Power and the White Power movements. Both groups, for example, see a racial conflict as imminent. Both refer to police as ?pigs? (an issue in Ron and Patrice?s relationship). Ron finds himself with a foot in each group and trying to maintain his role as someone who is trying to make the world better.

But Lee does not make this a film about how whites don?t get it. Certainly the people we meet in the Klan are evil. But even within this group there are variations ranging from Ivanhoe, a drunken, mindless follower, to David Duke, an intelligent, well-spoken proponent of White Supremacy who is seeking to make the Klan more marketable.

The police are for the most part supportive of Ron?s investigation. They, like Ron, are looking to make the world a better place. There is one exception, a racist cop (Fredrick Weller), who relishes using his power over Black people?including Ron. But the chain of command and Ron?s colleagues in the investigation are upright folk, not stereotypes of abusive power.

The film would be entertaining if all it did was reflect back on that time and see the battle against racism at that time. But the parallels with our own time are so strong that we can?t ignore them. It should be noted that David Duke was calling for ?America first? and ?Make America great again? decades before Donald Trump campaigned on those slogans. That language permeates the film. There are also references to police shootings of African-Americans with no consequences. All of this reminds us that the struggle over race in this country has really not come very far over the years. Lee makes that point even more strongly by including at the end of the film clips of news coverage of Charlottesville, complete with comments by President Trump and the real David Duke. The final image of the film makes it clear that this is a call to action?to continue the resistance to racial hatred as Ron Stallworth sought to do so long ago.

Photos courtesy of Focus Features

 

 

Of Course All These Alt-Right Racists Are Wrong, but Why?

you’re likely upset about
what happened in Charlottesville

maybe you’ve talked about it,
maybe took ?some kind of
social media stance,
maybe just sort of saddened inside

it’s probably super obvious to you
that all these alt-right racists are wrong,
that racism is wrong
(“evil” as Trump (finally) put it),
has always been wrong,
that we should do something about it

fair enough,
understandable enough
(of course i agree)

but have you asked yourself
why?
not why you feel as you do,
or why racism seems so clearly wrong,
but actually
why is racism wrong?
what makes it wrong?
put another way,
how do we know it’s wrong or
are we justified in saying it’s wrong?

i mean . . .

is it wrong cuz it seems wrong?
(but unfortunately it doesn’t seem wrong to everyone)

is it wrong cuz everyone agrees it’s wrong?
(but unfortunately they don’t)

is it wrong cuz it’s not “fair?”
(what’s “fair” mean?
who defines it?
who says everything is
or should be “fair?”)

is it wrong cuz you wouldn’t want someone
to be racist to you,
so you shouldn’t be racist to someone else?
(wait, what makes this line of thinking
the line of thinking?
is there some other similar line of thinking
that applies certainly?)

is it wrong cuz humans (or Americans)
all “deserve” “dignity” “equally?”
(again: problems abound)

maybe you think racism is
self-evidently wrong
and that saying so
requires no justification at all
(but is it possible the alt-right racists
feel they’re self-evidently right?

can science prove racism is wrong?
(or could a solely Darwinian/naturalistic understanding
of eugenics in fact be used to support racism?
has it been? is it currently being?)

(we could go on)

what i’m saying is this:
none of these lines of thinking can
truly justify the claim that
racism is wrong;
further,
none of these lines of thinking can
justify the claim that
anything is wrong (or right)
in general

further,
there is but?one line of thinking, in fact,
that can truly ground these kinds of moral claims,
and it’s the one where
we know, cuz God;
where things are wrong (or right),
in general,
cuz God

and so, further,
as a consequence,
making moral claims sans God,
ultimately,
is making ungrounded,
unjustified claims

so,
to circle back,
of course all these alt-right racists are wrong,
but why?
why is racism wrong?
what makes it wrong?
what right do we have to feel and think it’s wrong?
what justifies us when we say it’s wrong?
. . .
cuz God says so

(now, exactly?how we know he says so,
how and where he does so,
what reason we have for thinking so,
what to do in response,
how to deal with the fact that
we continue to make horrible errors
even given all of this, etc. etc. . . .
those are (excellent) questions
for another time)

[For some awesome unpacking of these ideas that I stumbled upon recently through the Unbelievable? podcast (which you should totally subscribe to), check out “The Most Important Thing This French Atheist Taught Me About Christianity.”?

This article doesn’t necessarily make what’s called “the moral argument for God” – as I have above – but it does specifically look at philosopher (and atheist) Luc Ferry to trace our western ideal of human equality back to Christianity itself. As Ferry puts it:

. . . the Greek world is an aristocratic world, one which rests entirely upon the conviction that there exists a natural hierarchy?of plants, of animals, but also of men: some men are born to command, others to obey, which is why Greek political life accommodates itself easily to the notion of slavery.

In direct contradiction, Christianity was to introduce the notion that humanity was fundamentally identical, that men were equal in dignity ? an unprecedented idea at the time, and one to which our world owes its entire democratic inheritance.

This [idea of human equality] may seem self-evident, but it was literally unheard-of at the time, and it turned an entire world-order upside down.

Given recent events in our country, it seems like a good time to remember that – just as much racism is culturally inherited – much of our outrage against racism is culturally inherited too, insofar as our culture is still “Christian.” However, we can intentionally?choose these values and be justified in doing so, as described above.]

Primary Sidebar

THE SF NEWS

Get a special look, just for you.

Hot Off the Press

  • GIVEAWAY! Advance Passes to DUNGEONS & DRAGONS: HONOR AMONG THIEVES!
  • SF Radio 9.16: Rewarding the OSCARS
  • Boston Strangler: Solving Mysteries & Re-Writing History
  • Tenzin: Struggling with Silence
  • All the World Is Sleeping – Not invisible or disposable
Find tickets and showtimes on Fandango.

where faith and film are intertwined

film and television carry stories which remind us of the stories God has woven since the beginning of time. come with us on a journey to see where faith and film are intertwined.

Footer

ScreenFish Articles

GIVEAWAY! Advance Passes to DUNGEONS & DRAGONS: HONOR AMONG THIEVES!

SF Radio 9.16: Rewarding the OSCARS

  • About ScreenFish
  • Privacy Policy

 

Loading Comments...