• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Film
  • DVD
  • Editorial
  • About ScreenFish

ScreenFish

where faith and film are intertwined

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • News
  • OtherFish
  • Podcast
  • Give

Based on novel

The Light Between Oceans – Hard Choices, Consequences

January 24, 2017 by Darrel Manson 1 Comment

The Light Between Oceans is set on Janus, a small island far off the coast of Western Australia. The Roman god it is named after has two faces and is often thought to be looking to both the past and future (hence the year starts in January, also named after Janus.) Janus Island we discover in the story is placed between two oceans, but it is also a place that lies between hope and despair, joy and sorrow, injury and pardon, and love and . . . love?

null

Tom Sherbourne (Michael Fassbender), a veteran of the Great War, signs on as the lighthouse keeper on Janus. He is looking to get away from everything after the war. He will be about one hundred miles from another living person. And he likes the idea. But just before he goes, he meets Isabel Graysmark (Alicia Vikander), a lovely young woman who is grieving the loss of two brothers in the war. After a bit of a long-distance romance, they marry and head to their own little Eden on Janus. Their happiness seems complete—until two miscarriages brings darkness into their lives.

Two days after the second miscarriage, a rowboat drifts toward Janus. Inside Tom and Isabel discover an infant and a dead man. At Isabel’s insistence, they do not notify anyone and begin to raise the child as their own. And so now they are a family of three—Tom, Isabel, and Lucy. But when they take Lucy into port to be baptized, Tom notices a grieving woman, Hannah (Rachel Weisz), in the church graveyard. He sees that she has been at a memorial to a man and child lost at sea the day before they found Lucy. His guilt at her deep grief sets the story for the various dilemmas that Tom and Isabel will face—emotional, moral, and eventually legal. It also means that everyone will have to face sorrow in unexpected ways. There are no possibilities for everything to work out nicely. In fact we may wonder if there will be any happiness for anyone.

TheLightBetweenOceans57964078f40eb

This is a story that deals with consequences. Each action creates consequences not just for the person involved but for others as well. Even when characters try to do what seems the right thing, there are severe, unforeseen costs involved. In such a situation, how can we hope to make choices that will lead to what is right? And we often have to balance what is right for whom, because what helps one person injures another.

The film also touches briefly on forgiveness. In a flashback we meet Hannah’s husband, a German who must live with the resentment of most of the community because of the past war. Yet he lives a life that does not repay those who treat him badly. He notes that you only have to forgive once, but resentments have to be brought up over and over and that is just too much work. This comes up again in the film, but could have been explored a bit more fully than it is.

TheLightBetweenOceans57bb6628106b9

I think we often find ourselves on Janus Island—that place that looks in two directions (or even multiple directions) at once. We are always on the cusp not just of past and future, but of the many possibilities of where our lives can lead. The choices we make may open some doors and close others. How we live in the aftermath of our choices often determines whether we will find happiness or not.

Photos courtesy of DreamWorks Pictures

Editor’s note: Special features include “Bringing the Light to Life,” a look at how Cape Campbell, New Zealand, became the background for the film via the cast and crew as Cianfrance’s work made the film what it is; and see the history of the lighthouse at Cape Campbell played out. 

Filed Under: DVD, Film, Reviews Tagged With: Alicia Vikander, Australia, Based on novel, Derek Cianfrance, Michael Fassbender, moral dilemma, Rachel Weisz

Septembers of Shiraz – Revolutionary Backlash

June 24, 2016 by Darrel Manson Leave a Comment

“Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I will meet you there.” (Jalal ad-Din Rumi)

Revolutions can bring great advancement, but they often bring pain and chaos in their wake. Septembers of Shiraz is the story of an Iranian Jewish family that must cope with the uproar of the Iranian Revolution. The film opens with a wonderful celebration of family and friends shortly before the Revolution. Isaac (Adrien Brody), the patriarch, is a prosperous jeweler. They are preparing to send their son to America to boarding school. Soon, however, the situation deteriorates. One day Isaac is arrested and taken to prison where he is questioned, tortured, and held without trial. His family has no idea if he is alive or not. His wife Farnez (Salma Hayek) must protect herself and her daughter. In time the family must sacrifice all they have to escape from Iran. (So, of course, there is a tense mad dash to get to the border.)

While we often think of the cruelty of these events as tied in some way to Islam, what we see is not based in religion. Rather it is class warfare. That plays out a bit in the relationship between Farnez and her housekeeper (Shohreh Aghdashloo). Farnez has considered their relationship to be one of friendship, but we see that the role of servant is not the same as a friend. The persecution Isaac faces is not because he is a Jew, but because he has prospered in the system under the Shah that has been done away with.

I think it needs to be noted that this is not an Iranian film. This is a film made by American filmmakers about a country with which we have a history of trouble. That is not to say I think the film sets Iran in a bad light. What struck me in the film is not how barbarous the Iranian Revolution was, but how similar it was to so many other revolutions. The ones that especially came to mind were the Russian and French Revolutions. In both, after deposing the ruler, it soon devolved into a kind of mob rule which took on the trappings of equality. In France, everyone was “Citizen”; in Russia, “Comrade”. Here everyone is addressed as “Brother” whether they are oppressor or victim. The goal here (and I think this is true of the French and Russian Revolutions as well) isn’t some ideological standard, but vengeance for past inequality—punishing those who profited from past oppression, even if they were not an active participant.

Always these kinds of revolutions claim to be acting in the name of justice. Yet often the new order, as it tries to right past wrongs, ends up creating its own injustices. Perhaps that is why the filmmakers open the film with the quotation from Rumi above. It is calling up to look beyond those things we believe are right or wrong (or even of righting wrongs) and meet not in a battle, but as community.

Filed Under: Film, Reviews Tagged With: Adrien Brody, Based on novel, based on true events, Iranian Revoulution, Revolution, Rumi, Salma Hayek, Shohreh Aghdashloo

Primary Sidebar

THE SF NEWS

Get a special look, just for you.

sf podcast

Hot Off the Press

  • She is Love: The Quiet Rage of Relationships
  • Black Ice – What’s needs to change in Canada
  • How Do We Do Evangelism?
  • Arctic: Our Frozen Planet – Baby, It’s Cold Outside
  • Dear Edward: Sitting in Sadness, but Never Alone
Find tickets and showtimes on Fandango.

where faith and film are intertwined

film and television carry stories which remind us of the stories God has woven since the beginning of time. come with us on a journey to see where faith and film are intertwined.

Footer

ScreenFish Articles

She is Love: The Quiet Rage of Relationships

Black Ice – What’s needs to change in Canada

  • About ScreenFish
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 · ScreenFish.net · Built by Aaron Lee

 

Loading Comments...