• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Film
  • DVD
  • Editorial
  • About ScreenFish

ScreenFish

where faith and film are intertwined

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • News
  • OtherFish
  • Podcast
  • Give

Fantastic Four

A Letter To Hollywood In The Aftermath of Deadpool

dp cool storyA movie that makes (currently) $490 million worldwide is a clear success no matter what it is. This is where we stand with Deadpool, and with it has come a whirlwind of news about Hollywood Studios ready to crank out a slew of films with R-ratings. So consider this, my letter to you Hollywood.

Dear Hollywood,

I understand that Deadpool is a success. I understand that FOX cut its budget and it still managed to be a success. What I don?t understand is why your job is to make movies and films, yet you fail at your job in understanding why some films succeed and others fail. The success of Deadpool is not because it was rated R and now tells you ?fans want rated R comic book based movies, let?s give it to them.?

No, Hollywood, that?s just not what fans want. Just like fans didn?t want all movies to be the brooding Christopher Nolan Batman franchise (which WB still hasn?t figured out), fans are not clamoring for more rated R films. Think about it, Guardians of the Galaxy shattered the box office?and it was not rated R. Ant-Man was considered to be Marvel Studios first, big fail, and it wasn?t. So why is it that fans loved those films just as much or more than Deadpool if ?what they want is rated R?. Plain and simple; it is because fans don?t care as much about rating as they care about authenticity.

Deadpool worked because the actor, writers, and director dedicated themselves to first love the character in his original form and then decide to make a movie that stayed true to the character. It had nothing to do with the rating and everything to do with the authenticity of the character. Now, FOX is mulling over an R rated Wolverine 3 film, and all though violence wise Wolverine fits the bill for an R rated film, a cinematic character that you have established for sixteen years as PG-13 doesn?t make sense to all of sudden break that mold and be rated R. You either have to go the full reboot, or give something that is not authentic (of course personally nothing of Wolverine has ever been authentic to begin with).

There are talks about making a R-rated?Fantastic Four film, another example of not understanding the source material. The reason fans hate X-Men Origins: Wolverine isn?t because they sewed Deadpool?s mouth shut, that?s just part of it. Everything about that film was the opposite of who Wolverine really is. Green Lantern failed because the movie never took the character seriously. Watchmen failed because the movie was not marketed correctly. You sold it as something else, so those who had no clue who the Watchmen were got a completely different experience at the theatre than what was marketed to them. It had nothing to do with the fact that it was rated R and everything to do with how the studio didn?t really care enough to make it work.

Hollywood, when you go up and down the list of comic book adapted films to determine its success, take a look at what was successful and what wasn?t and ask yourself why? At the heart of each failure, is a studio that decided that their version of the hero was better suited than the original version. ?And it?s not just with comic books: look at The Last Air Bender as a perfect example of a beloved established franchise that a studio and director decided needed to be remade into their own version instead of what made it successful to begin with. Meanwhile, those who have succeeded have come to the realization that fans love authenticity. Stay as true to the character as possible, and fans will eat it up. It is why Iron Man, Guardians of the Galaxy, and yes even Deadpool have broken the mold in their respective times. It is why fans went three or four times to see Star Wars: The Force Awakens as compared to any of the prequels. When you stay authentic and as true to what made fans fall in love with a character or a franchise to begin with, fans will back it up.

So, Hollywood, my plea to you is to take the idea of MPAA rating out of your head. Go back to the drawing board. Get actors, writers, directors, producers to find a passion for the original characters. Fans aren?t looking for MPAA ratings, they are looking to add to their passion that they already have for the characters.

Sincerely,

A concerned fanboy

Fantastic Four: Everything But Fantastic

f4

I have to admit, going into this film I had very low expectations.

If you are not a huge fan of comic books, then maybe you?didn’t pay any attention to all the news and interviews leading up to the release. For comic book fans as myself, all the online chatter?gave the impression that the film FOX was releasing was not a true Fantastic Four film but their own entirely different superhero film with the name ‘Fantastic Four’ attached. Although my expectations were low, I still had a small sliver of hope that Josh Trank’s vision for the ‘first family of the Marvel comics’ to truly be fantastic. However, it was not so. I’m not sure if that the blame lies with?Trank himself or, according to him, FOX as they cut and trimmed his film to the point where even he says that it isn’t fantastic.

If you are familiar with the franchise, the team?consists of genius scientist Reed Richards, his wife Sue Storm, her brother Johnny Storm, and Reed’s childhood friend Ben Grimm. During a trip to space, they were caught in a cosmic storm that?changed their biological make-up, giving them unique abilities. Reed can stretch his body and manipulate his matter into any shape he wishes. Sue Storm can turn herself (and others) invisible. She can also create forcefield bubble to protect herself or use that energy to project it at an enemy. Johnny Storm has the ability to fly, turn his whole body on fire?and?shoot fireballs at any foe. Finally,?there is Ben, who’s entire?body is?turned into a giant rock ‘thing’. He has the strength to go toe to toe with the Hulk. This is the original origin of the Fantastic Four, and not what we see in the film. (Though, personally, I think that is fine in principle. Creative liberties are fine and, in theory, the concept of it was interesting.)

Fantastic Four is a film about young teenagers (who don’t even look like teenagers) who are part of a team at the Baxter institute where they are looking to create a teleporter that can send man to another dimension in order to find new ways to save the planet or create resources. After they have succeeded, the government steps in and?takes over. Upset over their involvement, Reed Richards (Miles Teller), Victor Von Doom (Toby Kebbell), Johnny Storm (Michael B. Jordan) and Ben Grimm (Jamie Bell) decide that they are not going to let NASA be the first ones to plant a flag in the new dimension. Of course, their journey does not come without consequences. Sue Storm (Kate Mara) rushes to their help to manually bring them back and the result changes their lives forever. They have powers that the government now wants to exploit, and Doom wants to use to destroy the world.

There are many things wrong with this film, not the least of which is that it is mostly bland and boring. Most of the action you have already seen in the trailers leading up to it. The film is filled with medicore dialogue and characters that, although interesting, were never really developed enough for us to actually care for them. Fantastic Four (the comics) is about family and fun and being together and having a great bond, despite our?differences. This film touched on none of those issues. The family aspect is one of a broken family where a father is so caught up in his work that he’s too busy for his son (which we have to guess because it’s not really fleshed out) and yet shares a stronger bond with his adopted daughter (which of course brings a weird turmoil between the siblings that again is touched on and then that’s it). Reed Richards is too smart for his own good but, even then, he is missing for a big portion of the film and, compared to his comic book counterpart, he’s not that great. Kicked out of the Baxter institute for some unexplained reason,?Victor Von Doom is portrayed as a brooding manchild who hates mankind (and especially the government.) His character is?a horrible interpretation of the character with powers that can neither?be explained nor justified in terms of the final battle. Ben shows up for a trip, and then is a brooding Thing the entire film. ?(He even says his famous line, “it’s clobbering time” for no?reason other than? a nod to the comic character. Even?Sue Storm was really only used as a 5th wheel. While?Doom was going crazy, she was still not really “part” of the team or family (which does the character a great disservice). If his powers were as they portrayed, the Fantastic Four stood no chance against him. Basically, the film takes?all that made the Fantastic Four a beloved family in comics, strips it all away, and attempts to create something new that never amounts to anything.

fantastic-four-banner

By the time you can honestly say “That’s the Fantastic Four!”, it is the very last scene of the film.

There is one interesting concept in the film. Franklin Storm (Johnny and Sue’s father) tells Doom that they should not try to play God. Doom wanted to destroy our world and create a new one where he can rule….alone (makes no sense). But that is essentially the error of mankind more times than we can count. When we attempt to play God, we often make things worse for ourselves than when we first started out. The biggest lie Satan ever told was when he told Eve in the Garden that she would be just like God. Since sin entered the world, that lie has always been there and has always dominated mankind. We were created in God’s image to have a personal relationship with God. He tried to spare us from the knowledge of evil, and in an attempt to be like Him or be His equal, we are dealt with a world that grows much more evil as the years pass by. Yet, He still loves us enough to send His son to die for us and offer us redemption.

As of this writing, Fantastic Four?has a 9% Rotten Tomatoes score from critics and 28% from viewers. It is a film with interesting concepts and characters that never get developed (however 9% is low). The viewers are closer to reality as around 30% to max 50% seems right (which is still a failure).

My opinion? Save your money and wait for it to come on Netflix.

Fantastic_Four_poster_2

 

Primary Sidebar

THE SF NEWS

Get a special look, just for you.

Hot Off the Press

  • You Can Live Forever: You Can Live Forever IF…
  • John Wick: Chapter 4 – Pageantry and Pistols
  • The Wrong Ones – Grit and struggle
  • GIVEAWAY! Advance Passes to DUNGEONS & DRAGONS: HONOR AMONG THIEVES!
  • SF Radio 9.16: Rewarding the OSCARS
Find tickets and showtimes on Fandango.

where faith and film are intertwined

film and television carry stories which remind us of the stories God has woven since the beginning of time. come with us on a journey to see where faith and film are intertwined.

Footer

ScreenFish Articles

You Can Live Forever: You Can Live Forever IF…

John Wick: Chapter 4 – Pageantry and Pistols

  • About ScreenFish
  • Privacy Policy

 

Loading Comments...